Archive for the ‘arts news’ Category

Stacy Keach, King Lear, D.C. 2009

Wednesday, July 1st, 2009

Stacy Keach as King Lear, Howard Witt as The Fool

(Stacy Keach as Lear, Howard Witt as The Fool; photo Steve Mencher)

The king’s three daughters have a chance to claim their inheritance, as “King Lear” opens. He’s stepping down. To get their fair share of the kingdom, all they have to do is tell daddy how much they love him.

Goneril and Regan have been practicing. They love him madly, truly, deeply, and extravagantly. More than their own husbands, they tell him. More than life itself. But when young Cordelia, the third sister, is asked what she has to say to best her sisters, she can add no more than “nothing.”

“Nothing,” says the king, “will come of nothing.”

Shakespeare, in this melancholy guise, is an existentialist, a pessimist, a man for whom tragedy is not complete unless it’s accompanied by murder and madness. A man at home in the land of nothing.

Director Robert Falls knows this side of Shakespeare. The artistic director of Chicago’s Goodman Theatre and Tony-winning director of several of its triumphant transfers to Broadway, Falls has set “King Lear” in Eastern Europe, as an untethered state drifts into chaos, anarchy, and ethnic cleansing. He has found commonalities in the breakup of Lear’s kingdom and the bloodshed that ensued after Marshal Tito died in 1980 or the uncertainty after Romania’s Ceausescu was executed.

Count me among those who passionately hate Shakespeare that’s updated for the sake of variety or “engagement” with modern audiences. The conceits usually fall apart by scene two, when you wonder why these modern folks are spouting iambic pentameter. So why does this production work?

I’d say it’s because of the absolute conviction of the actors and production team. Their passion and commitment are bent to the common work of telling this spellbinding story. We all have fathers, of course. And for those of us with daughters, don’t we crave their love, their acceptance, their agreement to carry on our hopes and dreams in ways more ineffable than sons could?

Did I mention that I saw “King Lear” on Father’s Day? Robert Falls, perhaps having heard that I’d suggested running our “King Lear” story at AARP on Father’s Day grinned at me conspiratorially when he saw me, asked if I was having a good time, and assured me he was. “Father’s Day,” he muttered, eyes gleaming. Couldn’t tell if he was making fun of me or sharing a joke.

Yes, a good time was had by all. As Gloucester’s eyes are gouged out like so much troublesome jelly. As Lear slides into madness and hopelessness. As, one after another, the characters in the play are shot, stabbed, garroted, raped, and murdered.

So what’s good about it? What are we “enjoying?” First is craft. It’s quite a kick to see Stacy Keach stretching himself to explore every cranny of this aging monarch. He is by turns wily, furious, absent, volcanic, and always believable and human. It’s the performance of a lifetime for a man who has had a career that never moved in a straight line. MacBird, Hamlet, Macbeth, Mike Hammer, and the voice that launched a thousand documentaries. Here he seems at home on stage, after wowing Chicago in this role in 2006, and surviving a stroke last spring. He’s alive, and loving it.

The second great pleasure of this production is to be in the presence of what I might call a Chicago school of ensemble acting. I’ve been enjoying this tsunami of energy since my days in Chicago in the early 1970s, and most recently in the fabulous work of Mary Zimmerman. Chicago’s best directors and the actors they work with seem to operate at a fever pitch; they trust each other to be brave and unselfish, and turn themselves inside out in public.

Did I mention that Bob Falls is a madman and a genius? He knows that “Lear” – a play about love and pain, about seeing and nothing, about power and corruption – is expressed in every syllable of language on the page, and every gesture made by every person on stage. There is no wasted sound or motion in this “Lear.” It moves like a runaway freight train. The work he does in animating “Lear” is work all directors do. He just does it as well as anyone working today.

This particular train, by the way, is on the road to Hell, where we are deposited, spent and weary at the end of the evening.

Michael Kahn’s Shakespeare Theatre Company, presenting “Lear” in the nation’s capital through the end of July, has been warning Washington for months about this show. Expect nudity and extraordinary violence, they said. In fact, they were so concerned about possible offense to the unwary that the show comes literally with a warning sticker that it is for “Mature Audiences Only.” We’ll pray it finds them.

Waiting for Godot: Second Acts in an Uncertain World

Sunday, June 7th, 2009

Nathan Lane and Bill Irwin in Waiting for Godot

A dog came in the kitchen
And stole a crust of bread,
Then cook up with the ladle,
And beat him ’til he was dead.
Then all the dogs came running
And dug the dog a tomb
And wrote upon the tombstone
For the eyes of dogs to come…
(repeat)

Is there a name for this kind of Escher-like song that winds around and bites its tail and provides the promise that it could go on forever? Let me know.

So. Bill Irwin as Vladimir, one of two existential tramps, has come on stage singing this ditty to open the second act of “Waiting for Godot.”

The second act, always an Everest for a playwright to conquer, is especially important to ‘Godot,’ since it is a play about such fundamental questions as: what does our life mean? What is memory? If our being here is a result of God’s work, is it an act of bad faith on His part? And if God has written Act I, what’s the evidence it actually happened, and who’s in charge during Act II?

Spoiler alert.  Did we mention that this heavenly playwright, director, puppet master, or phantasm–God, Godot, God-Oh–never comes?

And yet we wait.

Meanwhile – in Bill Irwin’s singing, I found the meaning of a play nearly everyone acknowledges as one of the towering achievements of 20th century drama. The hit production, extended through July, represents the first time since its New York premiere in 1956 that “Waiting for Godot” has returned to Broadway.

Back to Irwin. The funny thing that happens at the top of Act Two is that after Irwin finishes his song, he keeps singing the rest of his dialogue. I don’t believe that’s a stage direction. There certainly isn’t a score. Yet every word is sung with carefully considered pitch and rhythm. Perhaps he sang all the way through Act One as well, but now there’s no way to go back and be sure.

The content is almost secondary. Vague stuff about the Bible, and whether we’re surrounded by the souls of all the people who ever lived. Perhaps we’re already one of those dead. We fear that we’re here on earth living in a meaningless dream.

“Let’s go. We can’t. Why not? We’re waiting for Godot.” Beat.

What’s funny, too, is that Irwin is sharing the stage with one of Broadway’s best and most accomplished musical comedy stars. And Nathan Lane as Vladimir’s partner in life, Estragon, refuses to sing.  Instead, he communicates using every inch of his body. With a turn of the head here, a spray of “air quotes” there, a slightly raised eyebrow to top it all off, Lane reminds us that we are in the presence of an actor used to owning the stage, yet fully comfortable sharing it. But there’s no shtick. No trademark Nathan Lane wiseguy-isms. Or not too many.

At this point in thinking about Godot, I went back to find out which part–Estragon or Vladimir, Nathan Lane or Bill Irwin–was originally played by Bert Lahr, best known as the rubber-legged Cowardly Lion in The Wizard of Oz. It was Estragon–the member of the duo with fewer questions, more time for dreaming, and a bit higher highs and lower lows. Perhaps when the Wizard of Oz is next revived, in some medium, Lane can return the favor by playing the scaredy-cat without a lion’s courage.

Second Acts. As we grow older, is change possible? The barren tree, which dominates the set of grey rockpiles has sprouted mysterious and rather useless leaves during intermission.

Is that change? Do people in command, like the brutish Pozzo played by an imperious and physically imposing John Goodman, change, even if it’s not to their advantage? And what of Pozzo’s slave, the ironically named Lucky? Are we surprised when he insists on handing his own chains to master Pozzo, as if to reinforce his powerlessness, and ours? (With four spectacular performances, John Glover’s feral Lucky is the only one recognized with a Tony nomination.

Goodman plays the Second Act as a beached walrus, a killer whale who has forgotten how to kill. Yes, kings and emperors die. Ashes to ashes. Pozzo is blind. Sans eyes, sans teeth, as Shakespeare had it, sans everything.

So what are we to take away from Godot? What keeps us from rising out of our seats at the end of Act Two, and slitting our wrists about the hopelessness and meaninglessness of waiting for something that is sure never to come?

What sustains us? The waiting itself? Friendship? The power of words to conjure up a human world that, in flashes, almost makes the whole thing worthwhile? Maybe.

Or maybe it’s song. Bill Irwin’s magical addition to Samuel Becket’s language gives it the wings that are only latent on the page. Ideas, emotions, our physical beings, the tone and smack of music, matter. We matter.

And then there’s laughter.  Maybe that’s what makes life bearable. There’s plenty of evidence in this warm and funny production that laughter can heal. Almost as much as the evidence that it cannot. This can’t be mere happiness of course. Laughing, as Vladimir know, grabbing his nether regions to staunch the pain from every chortle, hurts.

Still. That’s the conundrum. One of the funniest plays ever written about nothingness and existential dread sends the crowd out into the street on a Wednesday afternoon, happy to face another set of blows. That’s why Godot is good and great.

Now if I could only get to London, where Ian McKellen and Patrick Stewart are dazzling audiences in Godot this summer, my life would be complete.

Siento Hermosa (West Side Story 2008)

Monday, January 5th, 2009

West Side Story: Matt Cavanaugh and Josefina Scaglione“I Feel Pretty.” Or “Siento Hermosa.” The brilliant and problematic stroke of genius in this new production of West Side Story, seen at Washington’s National Theater, is not only to have real Latinos playing most of the Sharks, but to have them sing and speak in Spanish, as well as English.

So why do I feel robbed, rather than pretty?Well, one of the great pleasures of WSS is to hear the poetry of songs like “I Feel Pretty/Oh so pretty/I feel pretty, and witty and bright/And I pity/Any girl who isn’t me tonight.”

And although I speak some Spanish, I’m not good enough to appreciate whether Lin-Manuel Miranda’s Spanish translations catch the quicksilver poetry of the young Stephen Sondheim.I’m told that the early previews in Washington (I caught the show on December 30, and the plan was to open to the press January 7) included supertitles so that English-only speakers could understand the large sections of Spanish in the show. They’d done away with the translations by the time we caught WSS – presumably on the theory that most of the audience would catch on to the action in this well-known and well–loved show, and that the slight feeling of disorientation English speakers might experience was a good metaphor for what Spanish speakers cope with upon coming to America.

[Read about West Side Story in Spanish or English]

Perhaps. But as anyone who has seen and loved West Side Story over the past 50 years will tell you, the Spanish/English problem is not the main reason why the show sometimes refuses to play. The problem, as my cousin Marc says, is all those tough guys dancing around. The Jets and Sharks want to kill each other, but Jerome Robbins has them dancing with each other instead.I’m absolutely sure that this was exciting, even thrilling, in 1957. But since the movie came out in 1961, the dancing has effectively killed much of the drama in WSS, at least to my eye and ear.

Beyond that – the cops, especially Officer Krupke, seem all wrong in this production; the musical arrangements sometimes seem out of sync; and it’s far too easy to leave the theater dry-eyed and unaffected by the drama.

Arthur Laurents, the show’s librettist (and the director of this production) who is now 90 years old, has tried to reimagine the show for an America where Spanish is now on the verge of becoming our semi-official second language. He’s also juiced up the anger and psychosis of the gang members to avoid the prancing killers problem. But unless the show changes significantly before it gets to Broadway, there could be a major train wreck.

Photo by Joan Marcus. Josefina Scaglione as Maria and Matt Cavenaugh as Tony.

Garrison Keillor’s New York

Wednesday, December 17th, 2008

Garrison KeillorAppearing in the elegant Feinstein’s at Loews Regency, Garrison Keillor is engaging, maddening, entertaining, and just about perfect. The maddening first – Keillor is a storyteller who sings, and this is a singing nightclub act. He’s musical to a fault, and has a breadth of knowledge about American song that approaches his host’s (Feinstein knows everything about the American songbook). Now and then one longs for a little less personality and a little more legato… but who am I to judge…

The storytelling of course, is practiced, and perfect. Guy Noir makes an appearance, which fits better than a trip to Lake Wobegon. And Keillor settles in for a story of lost love that bows to O’Henry, without relinquishing his own place in the narrative firmament. (photo credit: Brian Velenchenko)

It’s a pleasure to spend time in Keillor’s company in this small room, when so much of your experience of him has been either on the radio, or in a big theater, or in the slightly misfiring film that was made of Prairie Home a few years back. Here, Keillor is the host of an intimate party… with accompanist Rich Dworsky ably commanding the Steinway… sharing his favorite songs, telling stories about his first visits to the big city and giving great thanks to the unnamed assistant who rescued his first short story from the slush pile and helped it find a home in The New Yorker. And thus, he says, a career was born.

Favorite moments – the music of Irving Berlin – “All Alone” and “What’ll I Do”; “Save the Last Dance,” by under-appreciated master songwriter Doc Pomus; and settings of sonnets that Keillor himself writes – a CD of these is on the way in 2009.

As any fan knows, Keillor is masterful in blending his voice in perfect harmony. When I saw his show, he had asked his radio guest of the night before, Andra Suchy, to stay on and do a few numbers. Keillor’s harmony sometimes overwhelmed her melody, but, hey, it was his show. “Man in Tux in Red Shoes with Piano” runs Sunday nights through December 28th.

Divas in New York

Monday, February 4th, 2008

Joanna NewsomSince the first of the year, I’ve seen three incredible women in concert in New York City: Barbara Cook, Judy Kuhn, and Joanna Newsom.

Perhaps the last is the most interesting. As a rather clueless 55-year-old, I’d never heard of Newsom, let alone heard her sing. But the excitement of going to the big city is partly about serendipity. With an extra night to see a show, I scoped out the most exciting event that had the maximum hip signifiers (BAM, sold out, freak folk, harpist, accompanied by a symphony orchestra) and begged a ticket because of my media connections as a senior producer at the senior’s product.

So who and what are Joanna Newsom? Well, everyone there was in their twenties and thirties. Everyone was dressed as an artistic sort, or a tech type. And Ms. Newsom was a winsome pop songstress, who sometimes sounded like a mewling cat, but only enough to scare away the old folk. With roots in Irish and Scottish folks songs, singer songerwriter expressionism, and straight from the heart girlish charm, Newsom was that perfect work of art, a singer who spoke directly into the ears of her audience.

To hear her, search for her on YouTube…

More on Barbara Cook, and Judy Kuhn as Laura Nyro, as soon as I can prove that more than three people have read this recent post. Write to me: menschmedia(at)yahoo.com.

See my most recent work at http://radioprimetime.org/specials/

Arts Today – ‘Talk Radio’ Radio Talk, ‘Tristan’ , ‘The Producers’ calls it a day

Friday, February 23rd, 2007

Talk Radio websiteTalk Radio

The producers of Eric Bogosian’s “Talk Radio” on Broadway, which stars hyperserious Liev Schrieber, are taking out huge print ads complaining that their radio spots have been “banned.” Apparently, the words “pet orgasm” cannot be spoken into the ether in virginal New York City. Listen for yourself. Of course the controversy is much more valuable than the small number of impressions that would have been made by the spots. Got us to listen, didn’t they?

Tristan

“The Tristan Project” brings together the hottest talent in performance today, including director Peter Sellars, video artist Bill Viola, conductor Esa-Pekka Salonen, and mezzo-soprano Anne Sofie von Otter. They have reimagined Wagner’s opera “Tristan and Isolde” in a staging that is dominated by Viola’s giant, ultra-high-definition video images. The Project yanks Wagner’s opera into the 21st Century, for better or worse, and demands we consider it as something brand new.

Heard in its premiere engagement at Walt Disney Concert Hall, the result was, in turn, exhilirating and stupefying. The video tended to overpower the singers, erasing them from the scene, while their voices and the performance of the LA Phil represented the music in all its glory. The artists have continued development since then, and Tristan may have grown more focused or more ponderous.

Read more here.

Mel Brooks

Mel Brooks is turning his attention to the musical of “Young Frankenstein,” as his megahit “The Producers” gets ready to close. “The Producers” was a great show, but most of the headlines today have to do with business: the first $100 orchestra ticket, the first $480 big spender ticket, the billion dollars in worldwide grosses since the show opened on Broadway in 2001 with Nathan Lane and Matthew Broderick. It closes in April after about 2,500 performances, 18th on the all-time longest running list, according to the New York Times. (with free membership)